GSpot- Falcon, Falcon, Burning Bright?

by Joseph Matheny on May 1, 2009

in Robert Anton Wilson

Removed by order of a judge in Phoenix after a complaint was filed by New Falcon.

Joseph Matheny talks to Nick Thacher and Linda Miller about Falcon Press and why there appears to be two Falcon’s selling virtually the same catalogs since the death of Dr. Hyatt.

Also in this episode:

 

A new In Your Ear with Psuke, and a special bonus track at the end: James Curcio presents the first installment of the Join My Cult audiobook, and releases Join My Cult as a Creative Commons PDF that you may download at Original Falcon. Also, as a side note, we were contacted after this show was recorded by an organization calling itself the New EII. Keep an eye open for an interview with them in the future.

{ 204 comments… read them below or add one }

soror inanna September 22, 2009 at 12:54 am

Doug,

You have got to be one of the biggest imbeciles I’ve ever encountered online. So you claim he thanked you in 2 books (!). One of which you have a 2 page article licking your teacher’s penis, without whom you’re retarded little chaos magic group would be another blot of idiocy, and Psychopaths Bible.

So, in Psychopath’s Bible he lists you **** Last. ****

And in there you have a 5 page article ranting on and on about jacking off against a homophobic preacher when your own homophobia is displayed above. So, not only are you hardly thanked, have provided no articles of merit at all (that Chaos Magic “ritual” is your piece of work?! Are you serious?!!!) but you are in fact a hypocrite to what you wrote or professed anyway (if that rant can even be considered “writing.” Its more like a glorified blog post that Hyatt clearly added in there just to brush your ego). An ego that needs no more brushing, from my end anyway.

I wouldn’t say I despise you because I don’t in fact know you. But your ability for ad hominem is supreme, and I have to “guess” it would spill over into your personal life, so I’m actually thankful I missed out on “New Falcon” dinners that Hyatt wanted to take me to. I am thankful I missed out on meeting you and Nicktard, because the likes of you both are no one I want in my midst.

Have a time of it,

S.I.

Reply

Douglas September 22, 2009 at 2:29 pm

” soror inanna Says:
September 22nd, 2009 at 12:54 am

Doug,

You have got to be one of the biggest imbeciles I’ve ever encountered online. So you claim he thanked you in 2 books (!). One of which you have a 2 page article licking your teacher’s penis, without whom you’re retarded little chaos magic group would be another blot of idiocy, and Psychopaths Bible.”

As usual sor. insanity gets it all wrong again. I do not even have to claim he thanked me… it’s just a fact of life you have trouble swallowing. Williams Burroughs was the inspiration for the piece, not Alan.
If the IOT was so retarded why did Alan frequent so many of the events at my house and at Bob Williams House as well as Alans own house? He admitted that the IOT was some of the most fun magick and ritual he experienced at that time. And the IOT was doing quite well at the time growing rapidily the first decade I was involved. While Alan and New Falcon were instrumental to getting the word out worldwide, the IOT did the work. And you are quite the hypocritical laugh riot with your history of the use of ad hominem attacks on various people.

“So, in Psychopath’s Bible he lists you **** Last. ****”

As I would expect being an unknown author.

“And in there you have a 5 page article ranting on and on about jacking off against a homophobic preacher when your own homophobia is displayed above.”

There is no actual human masturbation in the rite and please do point out
exactly where I am being homophobic. Nothing I have said I would be afraid to say in front of any of my gay friends.

“So, not only are you hardly thanked, have provided no articles of merit at all (that Chaos Magic “ritual” is your piece of work?! Are you serious?!!!) but you are in fact a hypocrite to what you wrote or professed anyway (if that rant can even be considered “writing.” Its more like a glorified blog post that Hyatt clearly added in there just to brush your ego). An ego that needs no more brushing, from my end anyway.”

Heh, he asked me for it… I did not even expect it and was quite surprised.

“I wouldn’t say I despise you because I don’t in fact know you. But your ability for ad hominem is supreme, and I have to “guess” it would spill over into your personal life,…”

Than as I pointed out above, with your history of ad hominem attacks, your personal life must really be a mess according to your armchair
psychological theory.

” so I’m actually thankful I missed out on “New Falcon” dinners that Hyatt wanted to take me to.”

Heh, sure.

And the main book I originally brought up being thanked in was Rebels & Devils, which Alan writes to me “Without you this could never be” in reference to R&D. As well as being in the top two acknowledgments on the acknowledgements page.

http://www.dagonproductions.com/randd.jpg
http://www.dagonproductions.com/randd2.jpg

Now go take your meds and calm down,

Douglas

Reply

pendragon September 22, 2009 at 3:26 pm

Douglas — Thanks for posting these links to verify your claims. It looks like Nanny Eyesore has embarrassed herself once again in the face of the facts, which also suggests that she may be enjoying her humiliation; oh well, to each their own. If she is sleeping with the New Crude Falcon, I am surprised that Nelly Miller hasn’t yanked her off the cyber stage yet. Her uncommon talent for not just soiling herself but whomever she is in bed with is only upstaged by her flaming exhibitionist streak. What a gal!

Reply

Wellsworth September 22, 2009 at 4:26 pm

It is unfortunate that Soror Insanity is so delusional that she doesn’t recognize that Alan’s interest in her was purely clinical. But, like so many inmates in asylums before her, she now functions under the delusion that she is the doctor running the asylum. It’s so typical. *yawn*

The other sad factor in this absurd equation is that she is convinced of the truth and validity of all the lies, distortions and inanities that whoosh out of her flapping jowls and ooze from the tips of her typing fingers. Again, typical.

It’s painfully apparent that she truly believes that people who know the whole truth and nothing but the truth will continue to be considerate not to utter said truths in public. Yet.

Now, expect either a torrent of bluster and vitriol or some whistling past the graveyard, as that seems to be the entire range of her methods expression.

Did I say *yawn* already?

Reply

pendragon September 22, 2009 at 6:55 pm

P.S. I look forward to the release of Original Falcon Press’ THE PSYCHOPATH’S BIBLE. Seems like all the New Crude Falcon titles are slowly undergoing some variation of literary lobotomy — no doubt reflecting the deteriorating mental state of its CEO.

Reply

SI September 22, 2009 at 6:57 pm

those were the links ?! I have almost EVERY book signed by Alan over to me, dorqus. I have nothing to proof to you fools.

Please, republish more copyright violations so we can get more of your cash.

- SI

Reply

SI September 22, 2009 at 7:00 pm

those were the links ?! I have almost EVERY book signed by Alan over to me, dorqus. I have nothing to prove to you fools. You are annoying me…. now. You gang of jerks. If i saw you in my midst i’d do something that caused me to get prison time, so i’m better off leaving this site, permanently and awaiting the lawsuit against Original Falcon.

If you continue to slander me, I will file a lawsuit against you and a restraining order.

- SI

Reply

Douglas September 22, 2009 at 7:16 pm

Admittedly some of the changes are at my request… anything dealing with the authors I represent I have informed michael of NF that he no longer holds rights to any of the work due to his defaulting on the contrracts that New Falcon had with these authors by not paying the full amount due or paying on time, up to a year late on two authors. He is going to love that I am contacting Burroughs Communications with the info that he reprinted William S. Burroughs work without permission… they have clout and money and a letter from their lawyer will make sure michael does not due this again. He has already upset a number of authors and a photographer whose works michael republished without permission or a contract in Rebels & Devils.

Michael is removing anything I have written in NF titles at my request, I do not want anything to do with this slime ball who is making money off other peoples work and not compensating them as well as doing a crappy job on reprints. He would probably remove it just because he hates me for spanking him publically and bending him over and getting some of my money from him… I know everytime he has to write me a check to me it burns him to no end.

The Original Falcon Press will not have my work removed from the books and they are reprinting Phil Hines work as well and I look forward to their version of Rebels & Devils as I know the quality will be much better than the turd that michael put out.

Reply

Wellsworth September 22, 2009 at 7:22 pm

…and as I predicted, bluster and vitriol. followed by YET ANOTHER threat to waddle away, never to return. We’ll see how long that lasts. An hour? A day? Will her OCD, paranoid, primary narcissism be able to withstand the temptation to bubble back up from the trailer park and set us all straight, ONE MORE TIME?

Reply

Douglas September 22, 2009 at 7:35 pm

“SI Says:
September 22nd, 2009 at 7:00 pm

those were the links ?!”

>Yes they were… I take it you are still getting used to using the
>technilogical marvels and the web and net and all..

” I have almost EVERY book signed by Alan over to me, dorqus.”

>I have many of them myself so what?

“I have nothing to prove to you fools.”

>There you go lying to yourself again. You do that is why you keep
>stating you are leaving but you keep coming back again and again.

“You are annoying me…. now. You gang of jerks. If i saw you in my midst i’d do something that caused me to get prison time, so i’m better off leaving this site, permanently and awaiting the lawsuit against Original Falcon.”

>Heh, another brave exit speech… what is this number 4 or 5?
>So you are admitting you are mentally unbalanced because
>you would cause some sort of felony for what some people
>on the web? You are insane.

“If you continue to slander me, I will file a lawsuit against you and a restraining order.

- SI”

>And please… anyone responding to anonymous posters
>vitriol and lies has nothing to worry about legally
>This is just more bluster and blather from in house nutbar.

Reply

Soror Inanna September 23, 2009 at 8:41 am

Its not an “exit” speech, and choosing not to talk to cyberbully idiots with the delusionary concept that orchestrating a circle jerk group to pretend to be a homophobic preacher is something anyone in their right mind should give a damn about — isn’t ‘fear,’ its just choosing not to converse with the mentally deranged.

If I want a job in a psych ward, I will make a hell of a lot more than nothing.

And PS — (of import, although I know you have no rational mind to even read and comprehend)…

1. Alan was a friend of mine for 10 years. He was very dear to me, but no — we were not “having an affair.” We did have some very racy discussions, but its in his nature to discuss these things.

2. You have already confused me with 2 other people who I am not, even blatantly accused me of being some “whore” mistress of Alan’s. Its so bizarre to me that people so involved in Alan’s work are so much against his need for sex, considering Linda couldn’t have it. Or maybe — you didn’t know that.

3. I don’t really care what your opinion is of what I meant to Alan. You clearly didn’t know that many details about even WHO I AM so how the hell can you profess to know what a dead man thought of someone you don’t know.

3 clearly shows how absurd this is getting. Your are clearly just an insecure sniveling idiot, probably with a life you don’t like too much — maybe a fucked up family situation or who knows, but either way you are nothing more than an overgrown cyber bully. You are like the kid on the playground who takes smaller kids lunches then laughs with your gang after you beat the kid up. You are in effect — a worthless human being.

I thought that we might actually get along after I read your thing about Amy Andrews, because I was very close to her and very sad about her death. But you are blind — all you care about is your insecurity. Maybe you have a small penis, and penis gazing and self hating is all you can do, so you go online and rant and rave against a ghost.

You are eliminated out of the new books not because of the money — Michael has paid me well for everything I’ve done. But, because of your assholes attitude to people. You can’t deal in a professional, business world. Threatening a fledgling operation a “lawsuit” for your 2 page document — I mean really. All you did is dug your own grave. I’m sure you’ll be angry for years, especially after Nick gets sued for copyright violations and goes out of business. You can sit around with him in a circle of jerks, jerking off to what “was” or “should’ve been” or whatever, hating Michael until the end of time — who cares. It is you who did this to yourself, and it is Nick who did this to himself. Michael wanted him to run it, if you recall, and he refused because of his ego.

He could’dve had full control over everything still — but he chose to act like a child throwing a brat, and you right along with him.

I know you will reply with more slander, more ad hominem attacks, more misrepresentation of my character (someone whom you don’t know and already confuse with other people), but in the end who really cares?

I’m the one who deleted your stuff out of the books — and I’m the one who will keep on doing it. Nick too. Why should you care if you believe in Original Falcon? At some point, they will not be able to sell Dr. Hyatt books anymore and the police will go to the house and arrest them for bootlegging the stuff. Until then, you can ride on this high — but after that you will have nothing else to do but create your own works.

You can cater to the circle — jerks of the world. They really should make a new tarot trump to represent you types, because they are a dime a dozen. Many people encounter them on the World Wide Web.

Sincerely yours,
Soror Inanna

Cyber-bullying defined

The National Crime Prevention Council’s definition of cyber-bullying is “when the Internet, cell phones or other devices are used to send or post text or images intended to hurt or embarrass another person.”[1] StopCyberbullying.org, an expert organization dedicated to internet safety, security and privacy, defines cyberbullying as: “a situation when a child, tween or teen is repeatedly ‘tormented, threatened, harassed, humiliated, embarrassed or otherwise targeted’ by another child, tween or teen using text messaging, email, instant messaging or any other type of digital technology.” Other researchers use similar language to describe the phenomenon.[2][3]

Cyber-bullying can be as simple as continuing to send e-mail to someone who has said they want no further contact with the sender, but it may also include threats, sexual remarks, pejorative labels (i.e., hate speech), ganging up on victims by making them the subject of ridicule in forums, and posting false statements as fact aimed at humiliation.

Cyber-bullies may disclose victims’ personal data (e.g. real name, address, or workplace/schools) at websites or forums or may pose as the identity of a victim for the purpose of publishing material in their name that defames or ridicules them. Some cyberbullies may also send threatening and harassing emails and instant messages to the victims, while other post rumors or gossip and instigate others to dislike and gang up on the target.
Best wishes,

Reply

Soror Inanna September 23, 2009 at 8:50 am

Wheres the link to Psychopath’s Bible “thank you?” Did you leave it out since you were listed LAST, after various other people….

I think if Dr. Hyatt saw and knew what you were now doing, he’d stop talking to you. He stopped talking to the OTO for similar behavior, and he thought it was ridiculous. Chances are you were one of the “heads of occult orders” that he talked about, wanting to write a book about, a statistical analysis of the mental disorders they all seem to have. I’m sure your attitude shown through when he knew you, but he tolerated a lot of occult idiots because of the nature of his business. Probably, at the end of his life, he regretted making the “friends” he did. Clearly, he gave his company to his son instead.

*Bow*. Go on angry boy, post some more ad hominem slander about me, and defensive replies: — (see below for another group of sludge from chaos boy) —

Reply

Soror Inanna September 23, 2009 at 8:51 am

And by the by was it you who gave him the Cthulu doll? Because he gave it to me.

Reply

Wellsworth September 23, 2009 at 11:35 am

Ahahahahaha! Ahahahahaha! Ahahahahaha! Ahahahahaha! Ahahahahaha!

Ok, I’m done.

No, wait.

Ahahahahaha! Ahahahahaha! Ahahahahaha! Ahahahahaha! Ahahahahaha!

Ok, NOW I’m done. It’s too funny to watch this comic tragedy play out before our eyes. For anyone who happens to stumble upon this conversation late in the game, I suggest you go back to the top of this thread and read from the beginning, and watch the evolution of “Sorry Insanity’s” constant attempt to construct one straw man after another.

Can’t wait for the next episode of “Kelly and her circus of complexes” or “Still left standing alone in the high school gymnasium of her mind”.

Reply

Soror Inanna September 23, 2009 at 7:24 pm

Are you on crack today or something? Or is it meth…

Reply

Douglas September 23, 2009 at 7:29 pm

“# Soror Inanna Says:
September 23rd, 2009 at 7:24 pm

Are you on crack today or something? Or is it meth…”

The question is what psychiatric meds you are on… because I just can’t
imagine anyone being such a wingnut without something to help them
get through their day to day living.

Douglas

Reply

Soror Inanna September 23, 2009 at 7:35 pm

Constructing a “straw man” argument (that you accuse me of) means that I created my own argument and refuted it. What argument would that be? I have responded to Mr. Grant’s “arguments,” however if you feel I haven’t let me summarize:

1. I was Dr. Hyatt’s “whore.” (Nope, that was another woman from Eastern Europe. I have a picture of her vagina and emails from Alan if you continue to confuse me with her).

2. I was some woman trying to get her diaries published a few years ago. (Nope. I never met Doug Grant nor was ever at any party or group where he was present, nor have I ever “tried” to get my diaries published).

3. Michael Miller “ripped him off.” (I don’t know the answer to that because I wasn’t present for the business transaction. However, I did look for his “writings” to see how much royalties he was owed, and they were very minimal. I assessed that he must be in the wrong based on owning most of Dr. Hyatt’s books (that he gave to me) and other ones I purchased in the early 1990s before meeting him. And for those articles I did read, I found them absurd. That is only my opinion — arguing about “opinions” is never going to come out “winning.” Everyone has them.)

4. Michael Miller is “queer” and I am also having sex with him to get a job at New Falcon. (I don’t really KNOW what sexual orientation Michael Miller is because I’m not that intimate with him — and its none of my damn business; further, no I didn’t have sex with him — but that is none of YOUR goddamn business — and either way — I’m sure you will refute that based on not knowing either me or him. lol).

6. Dr. Hyatt’s “thank yous” in books to Doug Grant. I now see that he thanked him in not one but two books based on his links. One of the books he didn’t even post up there (Psychopath’s Bible) and I can see why — he was listed last after several other people. So, we have one book he was listed in — okay — Dr. Hyatt thanked Doug Grant in 2 books.

7. Original Falcon vs. New Falcon “lawsuit” and legal issues. Actually, Original Falcon is not even a party to any lawsuit in this matter, the lawsuits involve B.M.I.T. (Bertha Miller Irrevocable Trust) and Michael Miller. Nick is not even a party to any of these cases. In fact, he is merely just violating copyrights left and right based on his “belief” that Linda as “TRUSTEE” of her step-children’s trust fund is “her property.” Anyone even remotely knowledgeable about TRUST knows the TRUSTEE isn’t the person who GETS the trust, they are respondible only for dispersing it, and may get a fee out of it for doing this. Usually this is around $3000 a year. Linda has already withdrawn over $30,000 in this year alone.

Anything I missed? Please post them.

S.I.

Reply

Soror Inanna September 23, 2009 at 7:41 pm

No, the question was whether or not the poster was or is on crack, meth or some other drugs or drunk. Not whether I was on psychiatric medication. Do you always answer questions with questions?

Reply

Wellsworth September 23, 2009 at 8:22 pm

You know, it’s almost sad that when they finally come to take you away, you’ll be genuinely surprised and will try to use your transparently circular logic to try and convince them men in white coats to not scoop you up in their butterfly nets.

Arguing with you is pointless. Anyone with half a brain can read the record here and discover for themselves what a pathetic excuse for a thinking, living human you really are.

Reply

Soror Inanna September 23, 2009 at 9:11 pm

You just lost the argument (or, squabble over bullshit more like). What, in the face of the facts I listed all you have to say is: “you are insane….” (!)

(1) Are you a psychiatrist? Why do I have a court letter from Alan Miller, Ph.D. stating exactly the opposite to your testament? Is he also insane for writing the letter?

(2) Even if you are a psychiatrist, have you actually met me to assess my mental heath?

(3) If you have met me to assess my mental health, why does your assessment conflict with every other person I’ve met that has a Ph.D. in the field of psychiatry/psychology — even your hero — Dr. Hyatt?

(4)

Abusive ad hominem

Ad Hominem Fallacies of Relevance

Fallacy Name:
Abusive ad hominem

Alternative Names:
Insults
Personal Attacks

Category:
Fallacies of Relevance > Ad Hominem Arguments

Explanation:
The most common and well-known version of the ad hominem fallacy is just a simple insult, and is called the abusive ad hominem. It occurs whenever a person has given up attempting to persuade a person or an audience about the reasonable of a position and is now resorting to mere personal attacks.

Examples and Discussion:
Whenever you see personal attacks and abusive ad hominem arguments being used in a discussion, it is unlikely that anything productive will come out of it in the end. A person who can only make their case by attacking others probably doesn’t have much of case to begin with.

1. Who cares what you think about movies? You’re just an ignorant American who doesn’t know anything about real culture.

2. You have claimed that John Edward doesn’t really talk to the dead, but how can we believe what an atheist says?

In both cases, something objectionable is identified about a person: one is an ignorant American, the other is an atheist. The arguer then goes on to conclude that, just because of this objectionable fact, what they say about a particular topic should be ignored.

Instead of showing where the people have made an error in any of their statements, the argument simply attacks them for who they are, and claims that we can dismiss anything said without even considering it. But in neither case is this objectionable fact related to the topic at hand – especially when these “objectionable” facts are just plain insults.

The proper way to evaluate the merits of an argument is by looking at what the argument says, not by distracting people’s attention from the argument by insulting the person and then, unreasonably, concluding that your insult is a good reason to dismiss the argument.

Other common forms of the abusive ad hominem argument don’t usually resort to clear personal insults:

3. John has been proven to be a liar numerous times, so I don’t accept John’s arguments about abortion.

4. Well, we shouldn’t be surprised that Senator Smith supports this new tax – considering how long he has been living in Washington D.C. and working in politics, it would be a shock if he didn’t support it!

With example #3, may be true that the person has lied repeatedly in the past – so saying so is stating a matter of fact, not an insult. And the fact that a person has lied in the past is, for most people, a reason to be skeptical of other things they say. But it is not a logical reason to conclude that they never tell the truth again.

With example #4, there is no attempt to seriously criticize this new tax bill which is under consideration. Instead, there is just an attempt to subtly insult a Senator who supports it by attacking them for being in politics for so long, with the implication that his character is questionable. In both of those examples, what is being criticized is the person, not what they are currently arguing.

Keep in mind that the follow is not an abusive ad hominem:

5. John has been proven to be a liar numerous times, therefore you should reject his testimony and acquit my client.

Why does this differ from example #3 above? Because it is not an attempt to get you to reject John’s argument, but instead reject his testimony. A testimony is not an argument, it is a report of events. The fact that a person is a known liar has no bearing on whether or not they present a conclusion supported by premises – but it does affect how we evaluate their reporting of alleged facts.

Unfortunately, abusive ad hominems like these can be very effective, because they do indeed divert people’s attention away from the primary issue being debated. By making someone appear suspicious, ridiculous, or just inconsistent, people will start focusing on that rather than anything else. What’s more, once people get suspicious of a person, it can be difficult for them to stop.

Finally, of course, it is possible to have an attack by itself:

6. You are just an ignorant twit.

This is an insult and it is abusive, but it is not an argument. Because it is not an argument, it cannot be a fallacy. Of course, that doesn’t mean that such personal insults are OK – just that when they appear alone, they aren’t logical fallacies. http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/skepticism/blfaq_fall_abusive.htm

Reply

Soror Inanna September 23, 2009 at 9:38 pm

A summary of Doug Grant’s “problem,” a synopsis of recent email from Michael Miller:

(BEGIN QUOTE)

New Falcon is now current with all the royalties in question with Mr. Grant. (Nick) had been withholding records, this is the main reason why the payments were late. After this, Mr. Grant took the four chaos magick books to Original Falcon. Any judge in America would see the obvious conflict of interest here.

Original Falcon is violating American copyright law by publishing Lon Duquette’s co-authored books without his permission. Lon and his lawyer notified Original Falcon in writing to cease and desist, and that he signed a new contract with New Falcon. Lon and Dr. Hyatt signed an agreement (which both New Falcon and Original Falcon have copies of) that clearly states that the senior living author has complete copyrights to control and determine who may publish these co-authored books.

We no longer wish to have the chaos magick books, most of which don’t sell, and we are eliminating all “3rd way deal” books. (Nick) hoodwinked authors into paying to publish their own books and called them “3rd way deals.” (Nick) would charge the author money to publish the book and then offer them a higher than normal royalty. These books generally don’t sell. This essentially made (New Falcon when Nick operated it, before Alan’s death) into a “vanity press” for writers who couldn’t get their books published at a regular press.

Original Falcon takes on the books that we no longer wish to publish intentionally: Angel Tech, Montauk Files, Infernal Texts (…). These books do not sell anyway.

In addition to this, Robert Anton Wilson’s estate signed a new and exclusive deal with New Falcon.

When we finally can streamline the books we sell, we can offer quality books that do sell and that represent New Falcon and its authors well. (END QUOTE)

Sincerely,

Soror Inanna

Reply

Douglas September 23, 2009 at 9:41 pm

Damn you are one thick headed bitch.

You are guilty of everything you rail against above.

While I have peppered many of my posts with ad hominems,
so have you… in fact it is one of the reasons I replied to you
here, using the same tools minus insanity as you.

I’m just better at rhetoric than you are you stupid cow.
Michael and you are losing the propaganda war plain and
simple.

Now go shove that cthulu doll in that cunt of a mouth of yours.

Reply

Douglas September 23, 2009 at 9:46 pm

sor. insanity wrote:
“When we finally can streamline the books we sell, we can offer quality books that do sell and that represent New Falcon and its authors well.”

That is a lie. There are already posts in several places pointing out the
horrible binding job and quality of The Complete GD System of Magic.
The quality of the Rebels and Devils reprint is horrid, visually unaethetic
with horrid picture scans and decade old contact info for most authors.
People have complained in various groups about shipping and customer service issues. For awhile even distributors were unhappy from one
I talked to.

So please pull your head out of your ass and get with reality because
you are far from it if you think what michael is doing is quality.

Douglas

Reply

Douglas September 23, 2009 at 9:50 pm

sor. insanity wrote:
“Original Falcon takes on the books that we no longer wish to publish intentionally: Angel Tech, Montauk Files, Infernal Texts (…). These books do not sell anyway.”

Heh, more like michael doesn’t know how to market them or who he is marketing to, esp. Infernal Texts… I didn’t sell copies for years for
no reason at all and original copies of the initial publishing of this
book I sold for upwards of $120 on ebay… and that’s when it
was a chapbook.

Reply

Soror Inanna September 23, 2009 at 9:55 pm

Mr Grant,

I will admit that I’ve used ad hominem — but not nearly to the extent as you do. You continue to state someone has a mental disability who you’ve never met and you aren’t a psychologist. I mean, I have insinuated that you people may be on drugs, because you appear to be on drugs by your posts. They are a PLETHORA of personal attack/ad hominem based on NOTHING, no knowledge of the person you are talking to at all. I mean, to the extent your ad hominem directed to “me” was when you believed I was in fact two other people — a mistress of Alan’s and a woman who wanted to publish her diaries. So, we can take out 60% of your ad hominem because you were clearly speaking to someone you believed to be someone else.

40% may be based on my writing alone, and some of which are ad hominem attacks, especially the statement that you may have murdered Amy. This was based on rumors that IOT had something to do with it, because they had some ritual where you had to play russian roulette, and various people I knew thought IOT people were perfectly nuts — well beyond the OTO sociopathy. Based on your posts here — being so ferociously violent and abusive toward a person you DO NOT KNOW AT ALL, based on your interaction with Michael Miller, I believed you were possibly capable of murder.

I apologize to you for that.

Sincerely,
SI.

Reply

Soror Inanna September 23, 2009 at 10:11 pm

I don’t really know about Infernal Texts, as I’ve never read it. I can’t comment on your eBay sales, or what New Falcon will or will not publish. I do not make those decisions. I am an independent contractor and do various jobs here and there for New Falcon as I did for New Falcon when Alan ran it. I offered my service to Nick when I thought he was still in charge of it, right after Alan’s death. Shortly after that I realized that there was a big lawsuit, etc. I then decided to opt out of the situation until I could see which side was “right.” I personally determined (for me) based on the legal documents I read that I purchased off of the U.S. court website that New Falcon was correct, between that and threat letters from Linda (and I decided that I didn’t want to work for someone who makes baseless threats).

Over the last year an a half I have determined that New Falcon / U.S.E.S.S. is the legal company that Alan ran — and so I continue to work for them and defend their position. If that offends you, that really is your problem. There are a lot of offensive things in life is all I have to say. I am sorry that you have to personally detest me or hate me even though you do not know me whatsoever (and have even thought I was other people you “blanket hate” and attack, like you just have a hate gene and anyone who you see at the time can be the hated party). But, this seems to be the way it goes with the “Luciferian” tribe or “Extreme Individual” network, and I noticed this behavior long ago when I was a member of their drhyatt.net site. I cancelled membership of their list when 20-50 hate emails a day were in my box, but I still maintained my friendship with Alan.

I wish you the best in your publishing and if Nick/Original Falcon does well for you, more power to you. There are just certain books (B.M.I.T., USESS, New Falcon, etc.) that Original Falcon does not have rights to publish and does anyway. This is just against the law. And, Linda’s operation of BMIT as trustee is also against the law. So, justice will be served.

Best wishes,
S.I.

Reply

Abicus September 25, 2009 at 4:00 am

Sheesh!

Give it a rest people–No wonder Dr Hyatt referred to Magick as “Legends in your own mind stuff…” What anyone can see here is prima facie examples of two lengends in their own minds engaged in a flame war to prove that each individuals’ internal reality is the T.R.U.T.H.

Less talk and more walk please. Thank Baphomet the Doc left behind quality Work that has Real Value ™

Now both of you give me 10 Mussolini Jaws and don’t call me in the morning!

Love is the Only Solution

Reply

Douglas September 25, 2009 at 7:10 am

S.I.

You are a liar plain and simple. Your time lines do no add up esp. if
you actually add up how and when the reality of life actually
transpired. Check the statements you made and if they actually
follow the dates and times you presented them to be.

This like playing with my cat with a laser pen.

Un fuckingbelievable. You have nothing but useless gray matter
between your ears… michael supports a child abuser, michael
definitely had a conflict of interest when it came to the lawyer
he chose to use, esp. considering the questionable nature of
Hyatt’s mental state, IE: brain lesions, morphine addiction, etc. and
I happen to know the Doc smoked around me all the time even though
he was not supposed to, and he also admitted he drank too much… which
at the time I was going toe to toe with him… I couldn’t let some old
fuck out drink me… but he could… it’s incredible what an extra twenty years practice can do for your game. And he supplied me with enough
opiates to paralyze a horse… he was definitely a man of observation,
a bit misogynistic… and in my experience he used women quite a bit for
his own pleasure.

Hilarious how you and michael are continuously caught in out right lies… and since it is documented well, you will be summarily laughed out
of court and paying damages. It’s a train wreck I just can’t stop
looking at… there is something about people that will cut off their own
gonads to satisfy their own egos.

Ya dumb bitch after reading about you all over the net, it is obvious
you are a fruitbar, a nutcase, mentally ill, lost your marbles, can’t rub
two cents together… and one doesn’t need a degree in psychology to
see this right in front of their own faces. You have been kicked and
kicked again and you keep coming back for more punishment either
you are a masochist or a fruitcake…. and you stated previously you
do not ike Doms… so that puts you in the fruitcake category.

First Jacko and now we get Whacko here with sor. insanitys lies
and bullshit.

Reply

Soror Inanna September 26, 2009 at 2:37 pm

Wow the above email is not only abusive ad hominem attack against ME but also the now deceased Dr. Hyatt.

I have really no response to what you said, above, because it contains nothing of substance.

Best wishes to you in your alcohol abuse, etc., ….

- S.I.

Reply

Douglas September 29, 2009 at 3:46 pm

” Soror Inanna Says:
September 26th, 2009 at 2:37 pm

Wow the above email is not only abusive ad hominem attack against ME but also the now deceased Dr. Hyatt.”

> Heh, I told the truth from my personal experience and what Alan told > > directly to me.

“I have really no response to what you said, above, because it contains nothing of substance.”

> Much like everything you post.

“Best wishes to you in your alcohol abuse, etc., ….”

- S.I.”

I rarely ever drink anymore and haven’t for some time… you obviously
do not read these posts very carefully.

What a dumbass.

Douglas

Reply

Douglas September 29, 2009 at 3:56 pm

Quoting Michael of NF

“New Falcon is now current with all the royalties in question with Mr. Grant. (Nick) had been withholding records, this is the main reason why the payments were late. After this, Mr. Grant took the four chaos magick books to Original Falcon. Any judge in America would see the obvious conflict of interest here.”

More fucking lies. It is yet to actually be determined if Michael has paid
up completely on royalties… did he ever get the records that Nick offered
free and clear but Michael would not accept them without giving up the
PO Box… just couldn’t take them without adding on additional things he
wanted out of Nick… the courts have yet to determine who those records belong to and who owns the po box. He has also not sent copies of Rebels and Devils for one of my authors. So he still owes one of my authors and all the other authors I represented ten copies each of the book.

How is it a conflict of interest… more bullshit from Michael… Michael
defaulted on the contracts making them null and void. Thus I am
free to take them where ever I desire.

“Original Falcon is violating American copyright law by publishing Lon Duquette’s co-authored books without his permission. Lon and his lawyer notified Original Falcon in writing to cease and desist, and that he signed a new contract with New Falcon. Lon and Dr. Hyatt signed an agreement (which both New Falcon and Original Falcon have copies of) that clearly states that the senior living author has complete copyrights to control and determine who may publish these co-authored books. ”

Heh, this is what Michael did to me and my authors and all the authors I represented for Rebels and Devils. Fucking hypocrite!

Douglas

Reply

soror inanna September 29, 2009 at 4:59 pm

Just for the record, Dr. Hyatt never offered me any illegal drugs. I’m sure if he had cancer he needed those heavy pain killers. You make him out to be a drug addict, etc. I know he abused alcohol and cigarettes (cigars) but its really hard to quit nicotine. I know a lot of people who should but don’t quit. I think your slander and defamation of character of Dr. Hyatt is uncalled for and very disrespectful. Doesn’t really matter if cancer killed him or a train hit him, he’s already dead so I fail to see why you need to speak so ill of the man, a man who was my good friend.

S.I.

Reply

Douglas September 29, 2009 at 5:15 pm

“soror inanna Says:
September 29th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

Just for the record, Dr. Hyatt never offered me any illegal drugs. I’m sure if he had cancer he needed those heavy pain killers. You make him out to be a drug addict, etc.”

This was before he had cancer dumbass… he did it and that is a fact and
I am not the only one he gave pills to. Alan enjoyed getting intoxicated
whether it be booze or pills. In fact in one of his books he recommends at least getting intoxicated occasionally. One can take drugs and not
become a drug addict ya dumb bitch… and are you saying you never
ever took drugs for pleasure?

“I know he abused alcohol and cigarettes (cigars) but its really hard to quit nicotine. I know a lot of people who should but don’t quit. I think your slander and defamation of character of Dr. Hyatt is uncalled for and very disrespectful. Doesn’t really matter if cancer killed him or a train hit him, he’s already dead so I fail to see why you need to speak so ill of the man, a man who was my good friend.

S.I.”

It’s not slander or defamation if it is true you dumb fuck cunt… do you
have any working gray matter between your ears?

I am not speaking ill of Alan… I am telling the truth… much like Alan
wrote about the shitty treatment he rec’d from his father in his youth
as well as getting drunk, robbing apartments, visiting prostitutes, getting
arrested, etc. At least Alan was honest unlike you and michael.

Douglas

Reply

soror inanna September 29, 2009 at 6:03 pm

dude, you’ve lost it. this is truly redundant. who cares maybe he wanted to give you enough morphine to kill yourself.

- SI.

Reply

nobody September 29, 2009 at 7:24 pm

Just like the asshat troll that you are, you attempt to twist peoples words, put words in their mouth, and then become dismissive when they remind you of the facts. I’ve seen your history. This is what you do. You are a sad and broken human, who only needs a snake like Mikey to give you a few chores and titles, so you can name drop them like carpet bombs, because then you feel like you’re somebody, because deep down inside, you know you’re a big fat zero. if you weren’t you wouldn’t keep coming back and trying to have the last word. Pathetic, nauseating, disgusting.

Reply

Douglas September 29, 2009 at 10:44 pm

“soror inanna Says:

“dude, you’ve lost it. this is truly redundant.”

Dude?… I hate it when grown adults talk like teens.

Redundant???? When have we discussed what is three posts
above? And I’ve lost it… heh, you are projecting your
neorosis on to me. For all the huffing and puffing you
have done all over the net, what have you accomplished
in life of any significance? Squirt out a kid maybe which
any dumbass female can do

“who cares maybe he wanted to give you enough morphine to kill yourself.

- SI.”

You really either can not read or have bad comprehension retension…
who said anything about me taking morphine… it was vicodin you dumb
cunt… the very same drug most doctors and dentists give for pain…
and if Alan wanted to kill me with it, he would have gave me more
than one at a time… which someone like you that doesn’t know the
difference between their asshole and a hole in the ground when it
comes to subjects like this. And what is the deal with supporting
whoring but not taking drugs which have been used for just about
all of time… esp for shamanic/ritual reasons and for fun.

Get a life… being a messenger lackey for michael isn’t much to
be proud of.

Douglas

Reply

soror inanna October 2, 2009 at 11:50 am

Nobody accused me of being a troll (mwahahahah) and who are you? You are the troll, fool. Take a look in a mirror, you’re not even having a conversation, just throwing in your two cents like “the classic” troll under a bridge. I’m however on my way somewhere, and guess what I’m not paying you, except (perhaps) with the end of my sword.

At any rate, Douglas “the delusional” wrote above that he didn’t say anything about “morphine” pills, yet he wrote:

“(michael)…definitely had a conflict of interest when it came to the lawyer
he chose to use, esp. considering the questionable nature of
Hyatt’s mental state, IE: brain lesions, morphine addiction, etc. and
I happen to know the Doc smoked around me all the time even though
he was not supposed to, and he also admitted he drank too much… which
at the time I was going toe to toe with him… I couldn’t let some old
fuck out drink me… but he could… it’s incredible what an extra twenty years practice can do for your game. And he supplied me with enough
opiates to paralyze a horse… ”

Since when is Vicodin (hydrocodone/acetaminophen) an opiate? You were clearly talking about the morphine since only morphine, heroin and opium are opiates. Are you so mentally disabled that you can’t even remember what you write from one day to the next?

And, if you’re going to call someone neurotic, at least learn how to spell it first. LOL.

You have me rollin.

- Soror I.

Reply

soror inanna October 2, 2009 at 11:55 am

A high dosage morphine drip might be just what you need, Dougie.

Reply

Douglas October 2, 2009 at 4:08 pm

I mentioned the Doc taking morphine towards the end but no where is
it mentioned that I took morphine, rec’d morphine from anyone.

Also dumbass Vicodin is a opiate, hyrdocondone is an opiate… ask
any doctor you dumbass.

Heh, a morphine drip most likely wouldn’t kill anyone since it is
control released to prevent such accidents.

Stick to what you know because thus far you are just parading
your stupidity around.

Besides morphine doesn’t supply much of a high in pill form.

Douglas

Reply

Douglas October 2, 2009 at 6:49 pm

The real funny thing about sor insanity is that she avoids every bit of
pointed evidence, ignores challenges, posts word for word info fed to
her by michael and mr. washed up… heh, those dolts do not realize
their speaking and writing styles are quite apparent and sor insanity
is incapable of thoughs any deeper than a puddle on a side walk.

Please soror… tell us of all the wonderful accomplishments you have
made in life that has made the world a better place.

Douglas

Reply

soror inanna October 3, 2009 at 1:37 pm

why don’t you start with you, douglas? since you’re so worried apparently about making a change in the world. lol. lets see your list of “accomplishments…” oh running an occult group full of sociopathic narcissists? yay w00p.

Reply

Douglas October 3, 2009 at 1:47 pm

I’ve listed many here on this list…. you have problems with reading comprehension again.

Nah, you are just chicken and embarrassed.

Douglas

Reply

pendragon October 3, 2009 at 5:44 pm

O gawd you guys… get a room already.

sometimes i have noticed that what starts out as mutual hostility between opposite sexes that then escalares like this into, albeit virtual, blood lust eventually settles in the mettle of plain old-fashioned fucklust.

Reply

Douglas October 3, 2009 at 8:06 pm

“pendragon Says:
October 3rd, 2009 at 5:44 pm

O gawd you guys… get a room already.

sometimes i have noticed that what starts out as mutual hostility between opposite sexes that then escalares like this into, albeit virtual, blood lust eventually settles in the mettle of plain old-fashioned fucklust.”

Heh, not everything has to do with sex ya damn monkey. I’d ream this
mother fucker ten ways to sunday no matter their sex.

It’s about propaganda and taking to task those who lie.

Sor. Insanity is a perfect example… she says she is here because of
court documents she rec’d… which is impossible because the dates
she says she rec’d them do no correspond to the dates the records
were filed/released… she lied plain and simple. Michael and Mr. Jwashedupman feed this bitch info to pull the wool over everyones eyes… don’t believe the hype.

These little hitlers propagating the big lie… fuck’em

And with name like pendragon… are you the biggest dork on the planet?

I wouldn’t fuck sor. insanity with someone elses dick.

Douglas

Reply

pendragon October 4, 2009 at 12:27 am

douglas — i am someone you know of but do not know personally. i also know as much as you and maybe more about all of this. almost everyone reading this forum knows the score already. everyone here knows that soreass inanity is a useful idiot for new falcon and that new falcon is run by useless usess idiots. you are beating a dead horse into the ground and gutting your own reputation by the easy targets you choose to attack. why waste your time. everybody here already knows the score.

Reply

Douglas October 4, 2009 at 2:26 pm

Heh, I sully my reputation on a weekly basis… it helps keep the
flim flam away.

Reply

pendragon October 4, 2009 at 2:43 pm

LOL…au contraire…the flim flam stick to the sully like flies to shit.

Reply

Douglas October 4, 2009 at 5:13 pm

Hell no they walk the to other side of the street, which is fine by me.
and generally avoid me.

And do you expect anyone to take anything a “pendragon” has to
say seriously.

You must be an SCA member who I avoid like the plague 99% of
the time. The only thing SCA members are good for is their
mead.

the Teflon Dagon

Reply

pendragon October 4, 2009 at 7:01 pm

i am only taken seriously by those who see past the image and the name. thou art in the stage of lifeth calleth, thee inflated fooleth. besteth to withdraweth before thine assesth showeth moreth.

Reply

Douglas October 4, 2009 at 7:14 pm

And Hell! Who are you pendragon to tell anyone how to enjoy themselves… do what thou will and all.

I’ve done just fine in over 15 years of net wars… generally coming out
on top and taking no shit and no prisoners. Some people hate me for this,
others love me, others are indifferent and others are always there to make
suggestions for me which were unsolicited… which in my book is not
minding ones own business. A crime Williams S. Burroughs called
insufferable.

Spend more time figuring out your own faults rather than worrying about
others. In this situation I have a financial interest in and I do not take it
lightly… michael is impossible to deal with in any normal manner being the liar, cheat and thief he is… so it is fought via propaganda on the net…
and heh, I am winning and continuing to stick it to sor insanity and michael
which has collected me over $1000 and I won’t give up until I get everything owed to me… which is michael lying when he states I am fully
paid up.

The simple answer for you is if you don’t like reading it, skip it, go to
another web page, another thread but only a fool would continue to
read something they did not like, found boring or useless.

Illuminate yourself to the power of choice.

Douglas

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 6 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: