<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter: Voluntary Panopticon-as-Leisure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alterati.com/blog/2008/09/twitter-as-voluntary-panopticon-as-leisure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alterati.com/blog/2008/09/twitter-as-voluntary-panopticon-as-leisure/</link>
	<description>After a long day, we know you can work up quite a thirst for tasty entrainment.  Search no further. Alterati is  the spot for home-brewed, 100 proof podcasts of the Alterati.com editorial team. In it you will find a delectable blend of original musics, audiobook and drama excerpts, interviews with artists and media theorists of the fringe, and hints of strawberry and motor oil.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:13:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barce</title>
		<link>http://www.alterati.com/blog/2008/09/twitter-as-voluntary-panopticon-as-leisure/comment-page-1/#comment-160007</link>
		<dc:creator>Barce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 03:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alterati.com/blog/?p=2046#comment-160007</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for posting this. If twitter is the panopticon, then how can what is done in it not have meaning? Or to ask it in a different way, how can my self-incarceration through a system of power knowledge not have semantic content? I think we&#039;d agree that there is no Semantic content from a Prince (Machiavelli), and thought power now operates without the Prince, but still isn&#039;t there some meaning through some sort of genealogy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for posting this. If twitter is the panopticon, then how can what is done in it not have meaning? Or to ask it in a different way, how can my self-incarceration through a system of power knowledge not have semantic content? I think we&#8217;d agree that there is no Semantic content from a Prince (Machiavelli), and thought power now operates without the Prince, but still isn&#8217;t there some meaning through some sort of genealogy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.alterati.com/blog/2008/09/twitter-as-voluntary-panopticon-as-leisure/comment-page-1/#comment-160006</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alterati.com/blog/?p=2046#comment-160006</guid>
		<description>Shira... Great post. While I agree to some extent, I wonder if Twitter, like any apparatus of the Panopticon also has deterritorializing capacities? I read, &quot;At the supermarket. Price of Velveta up $.30. Enraged,&quot; and begin to wonder what revolutionary capacities it might have.

I submit for your consideration that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fuckingnda.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fuckingnda.com&lt;/a&gt; represents precisely the capacity that these systems also have to promote disobedience. Without this Twitter-space, its possible that Apple iPhone developers may not have galvanized. Could it have happened another way? Certainly, but the Twitter aspects are interesting.

So I do agree, to an extent. At the same time I wonder if it represents a tool which can mobilize our rapidly growing lower middle class. Imagine a Twitter-wave of, &quot;Milk costs 4x as much as soda, and I just overdrew while buying groceries, and little Johnny broke his arm during recess. Something is jacked.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shira&#8230; Great post. While I agree to some extent, I wonder if Twitter, like any apparatus of the Panopticon also has deterritorializing capacities? I read, &#8220;At the supermarket. Price of Velveta up $.30. Enraged,&#8221; and begin to wonder what revolutionary capacities it might have.</p>
<p>I submit for your consideration that <a href="http://www.fuckingnda.com/" rel="nofollow">Fuckingnda.com</a> represents precisely the capacity that these systems also have to promote disobedience. Without this Twitter-space, its possible that Apple iPhone developers may not have galvanized. Could it have happened another way? Certainly, but the Twitter aspects are interesting.</p>
<p>So I do agree, to an extent. At the same time I wonder if it represents a tool which can mobilize our rapidly growing lower middle class. Imagine a Twitter-wave of, &#8220;Milk costs 4x as much as soda, and I just overdrew while buying groceries, and little Johnny broke his arm during recess. Something is jacked.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

