Say Something
First Friday 4
src="http://www.alterati.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/james_first_fri
day.jpg">
![]()
You may have noticed that there hasn’t been a recent ‘art scene’ entry in
the First Friday column. This is not because I haven’t been going out to
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Friday" target="_blank">First Friday href="http://www.alterati.com/blog/?p=226" target="_blank">Phoenix
social element of the night is as strong as ever in Philly, and it is quite
likely I simply missed some of the more groundbreaking events, but for the
most part what you find going from gallery to gallery is more of the same:
generally well rendered still life’s, nudes, and cityscapes. Occasionally, you might happen upon rehashed
Picasso style work with accompanying lengthy, incoherent artist statements, or post modern meets art deco. None of these are entirely without their merits, but, like in the music world, we are desperately in need of something different. Something genuinely, uniquely different that isn’t trying to be different, or anything else for that matter.
As I shuffled from one crowded gallery to the next, I really couldn’t help
wondering whether the gallery business is simply a symbiosis of galleries and artists producing and procuring the accessible slices of a mundane, comfortable reality that none of us live any longer. Beautiful sunsets, birds sitting together on a beach, an arrangement of provincial life represented through a lump of cheese and wildflower arrangement- these are the elements of a glorified kitch which can only be called art if it is indeed the mythic reality of its audience.
By the end of the night, I couldn’t help but level that question at the art gallery “thing” in general.
Do they exist to present something that confound us and makes us question our lives, or do they merely present something comfortable that you can hang over a place setting in your dining room?
![]()
In a visual medium, it is necessary to woodshed perspective, color theory,
and yes, do your cityscapes and nudes- but why are the galleries presenting
this work as a final piece, when it is all essentially an exercise meant to
develop the skills necessary to actually say something with your art?
When cameras were invented, many painters thought they were out of a
profession. However, this invention instead helped to demonstrate what the
real function of painting was, and helped push the art form further away
from mere recreation. It must evoke and emote. In the photographic age a
realistic representation itself becomes a comment on the subject, a
conscious choice, but in the case of a photo realistic apple, what does it
say except “I am an apple”?
It makes me think that the curatorial process here is not one based on the
art at all, but instead what kind of overpriced art the gallery owners think
will sell to rich yuppies who desperately want to telegraph class and poise
to their peers. (Which is not to say that it isn’t the work that the artists
themselves are producing in either event, but it is certainly telling when
nearly every gallery owner seems to pick the same kind of work.)
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representation_(arts)" target="_blank">representational work![]()
You can see many artists at the point of skirting the line with this
apple, say- and rendering it in a different style. This is much like the
practice in Jazz of taking the chord changes of a tired old tune, and
blowing through them in a new way- only truly interesting when the artist in
question has such a complete grasp of their own voice that it becomes a
unique piece of music. (For example, Coltrane’s
href="http://www.alterati.net/details.php?id=288479" target="_blank">Favorite Things
It may be that even in the art world these days, the financial overhead and
other necessities of a scene supersede everything else. From the standpoint
of sales a still life is a safe bet- most people know what a flower or an
apple is, and there seems to never be a shortage of people who want to buy
paintings of them.
As I reported in my
target="_blank">first Philly article
more often approaches the cutting edge. And of late, cops have been cracking
down on the ‘illegal’ street artists. There are several galleries which seem
to defy this rule, consistently curating the unusual, the brilliant, or the
plain inexplicable exceptions- but that number appears to be dwindling.
Whether there are others picking up the torch that I simply haven’t heard
of, or if it was just an off month is anyone’s guess. Local art blogs
href="http://www.uwishunu.com/category/Arts/" target="_blank">continue to report some interesting events within the city
drifting away from the First Friday event.
The art that defies expectations and defines an era may never consistently
sell in its day. Yet without that work, those looking to be arrested and
startled by art will find nothing better to do with themselves than swill
cheap free wine. Art and business have of course been uncomfortably at odds
throughout history, but much like many siblings who seem so different on the
surface, they actually share more in common than either of them realize.
It’s the art that successfully re-frames our world that winds up defining
movements, even an entire age or people. It is also this work that winds up
going for millions of dollars several decades down the line.
However, for one reason or another, each generation only gets so many
artists of this nature- and it would appear that with the more recent
generations, very few of them have stepped into the limelight.
So, though I can tip my glass to commend an art scene struggling to find
it’s voice through tried (and tired) practice subjects, I’d much rather
present you with work that has both an identifiable, unmistakable style and
message, such as what I discovered at the
href="http://www.alterati.com/blog/?p=438" target="_blank">Tiberino Museum
Of course, this column isn’t restricted only to Philly- it simply happens to
be the city I am presently living in. If you have been in an art scene or
event recently that you believe deserves attention,
href="mailto:submissions@alterati.com" target="_blank">drop me a line
Otherwise, I will put it on hiatus until such a time as I discover something
of note.












{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
I actually just had an art show at a little local festival. It was basically a street fair with a bunch of local artists, mostly the same old shit, with a few notable exceptions. First, or course, myself. There was also a girl there who I had met at the first one of these festivals I did about three years ago. I had a table full of little mutants that I had made from cannibalized and reincarnated toys, fucking pikachus, mutilated and degraded baby dolls, the works. The next year I went this girl, who is now about 14 and well on the road to glory and utter maddness, told me she had started sculpting. This year she had a table with some marvelous creations. A my little pony with slit wrists and an overturned bottle of pills in front of a dresser mirror with little sparkly tears, a masterful caged zombie baby with a stapled skull and beautifully rendered gangrene, tommy pickles as a cannibal, and a dismembered sponge-bob that actually made one little kid cry. I’m so proud.
There was also a wacky painter dude that did these mind-blowing neon torrents of faces and color. And a kid who was stealing school supplies to make clay sculptures of dragons and samuri from the future for raw profit. It was great. I’m doing another show in Union City this weekend and I think I may bring my Photonic cannon Rocketlauncher, just for kicks.
you go girl.