Ron Paul: President of the Internet

Written by Joseph Matheny. Filed under Conspiracy/Fascism. Bookmark the Permalink. Post a Comment. Leave a Trackback URL.

Ron Paul: President of the Internet

Jason Lubyk

Ron Paul?

Dr. No?

No … fucking … way.

That was pretty much the reaction after the first Republican debate where the libertarian constitutionalist ob-gyn flew past such favored candidates Rudy Guiliani, John McCain and Mitt Romney on a variety of internet polls. Blindsided by the apparent surge in popularity for the obscure candidate, the MSM – perhaps overly sensitive about being scooped yet again by the decentralized citizen-journalist aka dirty foul-mouthed bedroom blogger hoards – rushed to discover what was happening, what they were obviously missing. Many a story was written in the aftermath about the mysterious and unexplained “Ron Paul effect,” like some new planet or scientific law had been discovered, one that had heretofore been silently and unknowingly influencing poorly coded internet polls on earth …

lolrons.jpg

Things have cooled off a bit for the Ron’s supporters (sometimes known as
“Friends of Ron Paul,” “Paulites” or even “Paultards” depending on who you’re sitting with) as of late, with his ownage of all things internet not really translating into support in the “real world,” unable to rise above 3% in any of the major opinion polls. Of course that could actually be the result of a sinister conspiracy of international banksters, the satanic global elite or the blood sucking neocons, but we’ll get to that later. Actually, to be totally correct, the MSM has slowed down its roll a bit on the stories about the strange powers of Dr. Internet, but Ron’s virtual grassroots have maintained – even increased – their near-religious fervor for their unlikely secular messiah, proselytizing and yearning for a New World of liberated economic transactions, non-interventionist foreign policies, golden standards and happy stem cells relieved to be saved from the clutches of Faustian research labs.

Of course using the net to organize isn’t really a new phenomenon anymore – see Howard Dean. But up to this point it has been those on the left side of the political spectrum that have been the most effective at organizing and energizing campaigns online, the Paul campaign is a ground breaking movement for the libertarian right, although at this writing the effects are tending to be more virtual than material.

Here are some of the techniques the Friends of Paul have been using for their online march to the White House.

Online Polls

Online polls were their opening salvo in their campaign, surfers organized and dispatched from a variety and of blogs and forums, swarming and clicking Ron to the top, much to the annoyance of the owners of the websites who ran the polls, to the point of removing Ron entirely. For example CNN’s
creepy “conservative” blowhard Glenn Beck removed Paul from the polls on his website, according this fellow who used his “smart brains” and “fingers” to sleuth the shocking truth.

For Ron’s supporters the online polls are the equivalent of crack cocaine, the rapid and heady rush of victory, the equally fast comedown to the harsh reality of actual poll numbers and money raised, anxious again, broke again, sucking at life again … wait … there’s a poll at World Net Daily

Social Networking Websites

Not only does Ron Paul have more friends on MySpace and Facebook than your local emo band he has more than anyone else running for the Republican nomination, with 208 friends on Facebook at the time of this writing and a whopping 57346 friends on MySpace. He’s no Tom (199782345), but his friendcount is not too shabby either.

YouTube

Ron Paul’s videos are all over YouTube. News clips, speeches, home brewed promotional videos, Ron Paul/Megadeth mashups – with some getting hundreds of thousands of views, and tens of thousands subscribers to
his channel beaming an image of his soothing medical doctor’s face.

eBay

Ron Paul supporters or maybe just profiteers have a variety of buttons, stickers, magnets, t-shirts, and other promotional materials for sale (much of it apparently at cost) at internet marketplace eBay. “Google: Ron Paul.” “Revolution.” “Wake Up and Smell the Fascism!” etc.

Digg

The war between the Digg community and the Friends of Paul has been ongoing and bloody, with the “Digg bury brigade” swatting down the thousands of Ron Paul Diggs, and the usual accusations of gaming, spamming, manipulation and censorship from both sides, battalions of keyboard commandos fueled by rations of energy drinks and pizza ordered online click click click into the night, the latest edit of Terrorstorm downloading in the background, the war between freedom and governmental tyranny in it’s final darkest hour, click click click …

And a variety of other techniques such as online meet-ups and rallies, email writing campaigns (even targeting foreign heads of state and annoying the shit out of MSNBC), iPhone apps, bombing people with Ron videos from laptops at coffee shops, and on and on. I think it’s safe to say I’ve just scraped the surface of all the varieties of Ron Paul online campaign tools and tactics that are being deployed.

Don’t get me wrong, some of my best friend’s are Ron Paul supporters. And I guess – aside from the hyper-swarm behavior online – that has been one of the most curious aspects of this phenomenon to me. I can understand the attraction for your typical old school small government Christian conservative paleocon, but for your open minded dope smoking porn watching friends who think organized religion is a joke and who’ve probably taken their girlfriend in for an abortion at some time in the past? I assume that it has to do with Ron’s pledge to pull American troops out of the Iraqi nightmare, the ending of the intrusive Patriot Act and tax relief among other things, but as an example, for those who desire universal health care, there is not a chance in hell that it would come to be under his harsh individualistic Social Darwinist libertarian economic policies, not to mention Paul’s opposition to net neutrality and reproductive choice. Some are aware of that however, but see Paul as the only solution to the increasing oppression of the Military-Security state, very real fears in themselves. I guess it’s a testimony to the sad state of affairs that this is pretty much the only American political Presidential opposition to the blankly smiling uninspiring puppets and whores favored by of the corporate and special interest money powers.

Or maybe because the biggest Ron Paul supporters among my friends tend to have a conspiratorial lean, and Ron is de facto the candidate of choice for the conspiracy inclined. His comments on the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the Federal Reserve and the New World Order have appealed him to many a conspiracist, although it has been the 9/11 “truth” cult which has embraced and promoted him with the most fervor both on and offline. Although Ron has distanced himself from 9/11 conspiracy theories, stating that it was Osama in a cave rather than Dick in a secret underground bunker that commandeered the operation, for some reason that doesn’t seem to slow their embrace.

Paranoid hysteria aside, that doesn’t mean that those in power however are not afraid of Ron. From some reports it appears that Ron Paul supporters have been illegitimately prevented from voting in straw polls by Republican Party heavies. Whether this is just more hysterical paranoia or something more remains to be seen. But if you were the head of a military-entertainment-complex corporation, wouldn’t you pull what strings you can to quash anyone who could potentially disrupt your fortunes built upon untold misery, your secret underground bunkers filled with pornstars and cocaine, your vanity trips into space?

Anyway, to bring this back home, do I think the “Ron Paul effect” is hype or hope? As with most things, the truth is somewhere in between the two fanatical poles. While much of the Ron Paul’s support is as substantial as a Flash animation, there have been signs of the online organizing forcing advances in meatspace, such as the fact that Paul has surprisingly surpassed media darling/psycho John McCain in campaign donations, though still well behind Giuliani and Romney by substantial amounts. More than likely this phenomenon will be retroactively seen as an early manifestation and significant milestone of online politics and political organization, the importance of which will increase as the boundaries between reality and virtuality dissolve and your brain implant starts to be flooded with messages exhorting you to “Vote For FREEDOM!”

GD Star Rating
loading...
  • Share/Bookmark

11 Comments

  1. John Howard
    Posted September 4, 2007 at 8:58 am | Permalink

    I bet that no matter what happens in the universe, this little blogger will be able to summon up heaping paragraphs of snide, dismissive condesension so we all know how a big thinker views our silly little world.

  2. Posted September 4, 2007 at 9:13 pm | Permalink

    Let’s not forget the racist newsletters he used to publish, but claims not to have written. These, along with his militant opposition to immigration and civil rights laws, have made him the politician of choice amongst racist groups:

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/5/15/124912/740

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/5/17/155438/459

    Also, though he says he opposes the war, he says he supports hiring “private sources” to attack foreign enemies – http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007708070389

    I’ve always wondered why he’s associated with libertarianism, he seems closer to Constitutionalist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_Party_(United_States))

  3. Posted September 5, 2007 at 10:16 pm | Permalink

    Let’s not forget the John Birch Society.
    http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKbirchS.htm
    (see: final paragraph)

    He’s a post-Cold War castaway. A friend of Willis Carto is an enemy of mine.

  4. Mike
    Posted September 9, 2007 at 10:12 am | Permalink

    God bless The John Birch Society. They are againt both fascism and socialism. They are against coercion, that is they are against government that goes beyond its proper constitutional role of providing a police, a justice system, and national defence.

    Remember folks, government depends on the use of coercion to fund its spending. The money the government receives from its citizens is not voluntarily given, if it was, we would call it donations, but we call it taxes. The more government spends, the more it needs to coerce (tax) its citizens.

    “How soon we forget history… Government is not reason. Government is not eloquence. It is force. And, like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.”

    George Washington

  5. Posted September 9, 2007 at 11:01 am | Permalink

    Hmmm, well thanks for one thing guys. I no longer think it’s funny to feign support for ‘Crazy Ron’. I didn’t know about the rascist and Birch allegations.

  6. Charles Brown
    Posted September 11, 2007 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

    Well instead of actually looking this up for yourself you rely on a man who writes horrile condesending articles about a man hes never met.

    Vote
    Ron Paul

  7. Mike
    Posted September 16, 2007 at 6:44 am | Permalink

    There’s nothing racist about the John Birch Society. They have many black and Jewish members. They stand for one thing: individual liberty and fighting coercion against innocent people. They oppose socialism, fascism and communism.

  8. Posted September 21, 2007 at 5:02 pm | Permalink
  9. Jason Lubyk
    Posted September 21, 2007 at 5:34 pm | Permalink

    think it’s kind of funny that the jbs hijacked my title:

    http://www.jbs.org/node/5593

  10. Posted September 21, 2007 at 7:41 pm | Permalink

    Mike, the above libertarian critique of Ron Paul applies equally to the JBS: they oppose coercion only at the federal level but support it at the state level.

    And WRT their alleged racism, here’s an excellent article on the JBS in Public Eye:

    “In a sense, the Birch society pioneered the encoding of implicit cultural forms of ethnocentric White racism and Christian nationalist antisemitism rather than relying on the White supremacist biological determinism and open loathing of Jews that had typified the old right prior to WWII. Throughout its existence, however, the Society has promoted open homophobia and sexism.

    The Society’s anti-communism and states rights libertarianism was based on sincere principles, but it clearly served as a cover for organizing by segregationists and White supremacists. How much of this was conscious, and how much unconscious, is difficult to determine. That the Birch Society clearly attracted members with a more hate-filled (even fascistic) agenda is undeniable, and these more zealous elements used the JBS as a recruitment pool from which to draw persons toward a more neonazi stance on issues of race and culture.”

    http://www.publiceye.org/tooclose/jbs.html

    Two notable examples of “members with a more hate-filled (even fascistic) agenda” are founding member Revilo P. Oliver and, much later, Tom Metzger.

    Oliver espoused openly antisemitic views and was either forced to leave the JBS because of them or left the group because it wasn’t antisemitic enough. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revilo_P._Oliver

    From Wikipedia: “In recent years, Metzger has advocated the ‘lone wolf’ method of organization for white nationalist groups, which states that a person should not outwardly display his/her racist ideology, but must act covertly.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Metzger

    This is part of why many people believe groups like the JBS are a front for overtly racist organizations.

  11. David Howard
    Posted February 4, 2009 at 12:45 am | Permalink

One Trackback

  1. By New Republican Poll - Page 2 - World Affairs Board on September 25, 2007 at 9:13 pm

    [...] many examples would you like?Here’s a fun one. alterati

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>