
When I was young I was captivated by an abstract mosaic that was displayed above the doors of a modern Protestant church in my hometown. Though it was called art, I recall seeing it clearly as a pattern of nature, just as organic as a pattern found on a leaf. Its message was immediate to me. I related to the image directly. It expressed something that seemed timeless.
I can also remember my parents taking me to an area outside my hometown called Paint Rock to see the drawings left behind on rock formations by people who had lived there long before us. While looking at these mysterious pictographs and petroglyphs, I felt a deep urge to participate, to draw, to communicate.
Paint Rock, TX
Drawing became a natural process for me, consisting of several stages of development. I began with symbols and abstract patterns, discovering that beauty and meaning are connected to the form and function of the line. This encounter with creation opened my eyes to the actuality of a common visual language in which expression is not a consciously creative act but an impulse “which is produced by internal necessity.” It was now possible for me to see the language of the soul expressing itself outwardly through all the visual arts.
Impressionism is a word which describes a momentous mutation in Western art history when the doctrine of objective reality began to dissolve. For the first time, light and color took precedence over form. Unlike the singular visions of William Blake, or Hieronymus Bosch, a generation of artists were exploring the act of creation as a direct encounter with nature, going inward to create art that wasn’t lifelike.
Impression Sunrise by Claude Monet, 1873
This initial “impression” then split apart into tiny images made up of evenly placed colored dots, illuminating the natural landscape as a vibration of primary colors.
Seascape at Port-en-Bessin, Normandy, Georges Seurat, 1888
Floating past these colored dots of divided matter, some artists ventured beyond the visible world, glimpsing an inner landscape of symbols. These artists uncovered the personal power of utilizing myths and dreams,
dissolving the line between the outer and inner surroundings.
Homage to Goya by Odilon Redon, circa 1895
Stepping over the threshold and diving deeper into the psyche, Paul Cézanne uncovered the foundations of the forms proclaiming, “Treat nature by the cylinder, the sphere, and the cone.”
Corner of Bibemus Quarry by Paul Cézanne, 1900-1902
Influenced by Cézanne’s discoveries, new artists flattened the object and fragmented the picture plane. A natural step that soon congealed into cubes bound to representation, creating a Modern art academy of the elite class. This wall of cubes effectively protected the artist’s new found status in society, and successfully separated itself from the so-called “decorative arts,” like Art Nouveau.
Landscape with Two Figures by Pablo Picasso, 1908
Those who understood art as a means for psychic survival knew the immediate nature of art and its power of not only self-transformation, but collective-transformation. By uncovering the mandala, Carl Jung was in effect the modern world’s first shamanic healer. In a time of world war, Jung was able to articulate the utility of the ancient ideas of art as magic to the rational scientific mind. He wrote volumes on the subject of alchemy, involving the union of opposites, not only in its relation to individual psychic health but also in its relation to the psychic health of mankind. Jung noted that in both religion as well as alchemy this union was personified as a rounded, androgynous Anthropos, “the original or primordial man,” which contains the opposites of “the one and the many,” male and female, matter and spirit, good and evil.
Mandala, C.G. Jung
Wassily Kandinsky wrote, “That is beautiful which is produced by internal necessity, which springs from the soul.” He saw art as a step towards “an epoch of great spirituality.” Like Jung, he understood the mystical power of the image. He saw an overall narrative in the lineage of art history. He spoke of art as a realm “corresponding exactly to the physical process of the conception and birth of man.” Kandinsky had walked through the looking glass of the initial ‘impression’ of “external nature” and discovered not only the impressions of “internal nature,” but an embryo of a “biomorphic” spirit.
Various Actions by Wassily Kandinsky,1941
Descending deeper into the abyss, new modern visionaries moved beyond the bourgeois stronghold of Cubism. Jackson Pollock atomized it by plunging directly into the primordial levels of abstraction. Clyfford Still transcended the conventional forms by literally revealing another layer. These two creative mystics had balanced the arrival of the bomb. While Pollock expressed the disintegration of Western history, Still’s paintings appear to be mapping another space beyond it, describing his own work as “life and death merging in a fearful union.”
As the linear events of the Western world continue to unravel, Aboriginal forms of artistic expression remain as they had always been: sacred acts upholding the social network of the tribe. Without even realizing it, they already express the views of Kandinsky, because for them art is their “internal necessity,” their existence. While aboriginal art varies across the world’s indigenous cultures, its common central function is to maintain the psychic health of the tribe.
My travels to the rainforests of Peru brought me in contact with the distinctive visual patterns of the Shipibo Indians. I was especially moved by one Shipibo woman who told me their designs were not “officially taught.” She described it as being part of their collective, shared experience. I watched as a woman painting a piece of pottery left to tend to her child while another immediately took her place. They were like midwives to this organic pattern, which was in essence a reflection of the soul of the tribe.
This Aboriginal way of living with art that “springs from the soul” is alive and well in urban areas across the globe. Driving through Los Angeles, it doesn’t take long to notice the encroachment of spray-painted images and their impact on the urban landscape. Tagging is the root of graffiti art, a kind of organic variance of the written word. The inherent power of this is in the creation of a unique style where an artist can be hard for authorities to identify, while simultaneously being renowned within the community. As potent as that is, the more mature graffiti artists transcend visual word play into patterns that look as if a syntactical world is breaking through the walls of the city.
Graffiti Art, Los Angeles
Although I have focused specifically on the visual arts, I do not intend to discount other kinds of artistic expression. My intention is to express my connection to the creative process as “an internal necessity.” It’s how I’ve come to understand that history is an alchemical process. I’ve been shown through my drawings that humanity is a network of centers, whose order depends on the harmony of these centers. These images express a soul of infinite centers that wants you to do what they do; to live in harmony. They are a pattern of nature, an organic visual symbiosis. You could say it looks indigenous, but it’s not tied to any one culture. They’re an empathic communicative world of anthropomorphs born from a union of the archaic and the modern.
“Whilst the totem-animal expresses a deeply unconscious form of wholeness and a symbol of social coherence, we find on a somewhat higher cultural level a new symbol which takes its place: the great all-encompassing human figure which Carl Jung calls the Anthropos. The ancestor of all human beings. Regarded as the life principle and meaning of all human life on earth, the totem not of a single tribe but of mankind as a whole.”
- Marie Louise von Franz, Individuation and Social Contact in Jungian Psychology, 1975
Actual Contact
I have found that if I just concentrate on hand/eye co-ordination, I allow this inner world to reveal itself. I become open to chance so this world can pour through me. I am a conduit. Our current modes of communication are not equipped to handle this experience, this expression. The cultural languages of this planet have exhausted their usefulness when it comes to matters of the heart like this. And it is the experience of this heart, this spirit, this oblique symbolic approach to language that lifts the veil of dogma, and the isolation of being separated from the source. It is recognizing the patterns that alchemically combine both spirit and instinct that connects you to the never ending current of creation. Marshall McLuhan stated that “the affairs of the world are now dependent upon the highest information of which man is capable. The word information means pattern, not raw data.” An empathic language that communicates our wholeness depends not on dictionaries, but on consciousness.
“These paintings, sculptures, objects should remain anonymous and form part of nature’s great workshop as leaves do, and clouds, animals, and men. Yes, man must once again become part of nature.”
-Jean Arp “Abstract Art, Concrete Art”, Art of This Century (NY) 1942
Many stores in less gentrified areas in cities around the world have a place set aside for people to drop off fliers that promote upcoming events. This is where I leave small stacks of cards for people to pick up. There are no words on the cards, only an image on each side.
By Jason Tucker
website: http://www.actualcontact.com/
interview: http://www.tripzine.com/listing.php?smlid=255












{ 19 comments… read them below or add one }
Love these 2-D life forms you’ve created!! I just re-visited the http://www.actualcontact.com web site and was reminded that these anthropomorphs are silently speaking!! I can’t help but wonder what their language would sound like if it could be translated into our aural world. Maybe some juxtaposed sine waves punctuated by backwards trapezoidal bass thumps. I’ll see what I can come up with and send it to you.
Hey Jason- Inspiring construct of creative evolution. Clearly, something the majority of us overlook. Images are absolutely more powerful than words. Images in the abstract form move quickly past our consciousness and evoke movement in our subconscious and thus we can find ourselves either repulsed by or drawn to a creation without “knowing” why. In an instant the creator is deemed insane or genius – determined, instictively, by a viewer’s life experience. Your writing provides insight and understanding as to what lies beneath the surface of abstract creation. Your own images on actualcontact.com seem to come to life the longer you take them in. Would love to see your work in a fluid, animated form! Thanks for the inspirations.
Jason,
Your work emanates a complex simplicity which unravels on many levels:
to name a few…the alchemical process of the artist, the healing role
of art in society and bringing art outside the white cube. I dig
the action of you leaving the artwork cards in shops with other
publicity cards. This act is generous: these gifts for people all
over the world to take home and wonder…why would anybody create art
cards and give them out… for the pure love of creating and sharing
art? When an artist’s work through his soul-heart to create work, the works
glows with the matrix of the substance, the energy of enchantment.
You work glows.
Keep make it! regards, Maïa
I just want to say that I never said “Your comment is awaiting moderation.” those are not my words.
- A thought-provoking perspective on the creative process
- Intriguing artwork that falls somewhere between organic and abstract, ethnic and postmodern
- Quite the best history of art I’ve ever read in less than 5 minutes!
jason,
great to see your art up, and coming. Though, I ‘d like to argue that there are many forms of communication. Moreover, I doubt that the cultural languages have exhausted there usefulness to matters of the heart. language is an evolution, and a recycling. Viewing your work is a language in itself. What civilization would you call it?
Kudos on the anonymity.
Hector, I agree there are many forms of communication, music, ballet, poetry, etc. I am in no way intending to slight other forms of expression. My point is to contextualize my own images and explain how it has opened me up to see a language of nature. In regards to my reference about cultural languages exhausting its usefulness in matters of the heart, I’m merely pointing out that dogmatic verbal systems limit the human spirit and clouds our true potential of speaking soul to soul.
how about your influence by woman artist? I’d like to know what are your thoughts about the feminine creative expression.
Why should that be categorically different?
Bérangère, I feel that artistic expression that emanates from the soul transcends gender.
An identification with either male or female diminishes quickly when one connects to the harmony of an androgynous spirit. Sure, most of the Modern art examples here have been male, but the alchemical balance most likely had them inspired by or in direct contact with a psychic feminine muse or deity. This is why most Modern art is somewhat schizophrenic because these “humans” are ultimately just wrestling with something greater than themselves. And this “something greater” reveals itself as more and more opposites are unified. Male/Female is but just one opposite among many.
Now all that being said, I should mention Lee Bontecou as an inspiration, as well as my mother, and most definitely the Shipibo patterns, which are created to my knowledge, by only the women in the tribe.
Excellent stuff Jason. Ive loved your work ever since the first day I came across it. Im still not entirely sure why, but it just seems to connect to me on some fundamental and hidden level that I can’t explain. The world needs more of this interesting visual expressionism.
Mark would enjoy this discussion…
… oh, what the hell… I’ll just shoot it on over to him now.
Thanks for sharing, Jason, your revealing look inside the soul of an artist.
And for the record, I also agree about the gender-neutral position, as art seems to take on a more meaningful and long-lasting effect… the more interpretation is allowed.
Our make-up as feminine or masculine is not so clear-cut. And the best art allows for much interpretation… in a seamless “narrative” of sensation… not so dependent on wordplay.
It’s for this reason I can appreciate something about the commonplace or the deep-and-complex – and everything in between.
Art doesn’t have to be characterized by wimpy or nebulous qualities in order to inspire it either. It’s just that in a universe where the highest forms of free expression exist… gender-specificity seems often irrelevant.
Language and its role in communication – by comparison to other art forms – is vastly overrated. To my mind it indeed does separate us from each other… and the natural world from whence we evolved.
Why?
Because language causes us to constantly sort things out and dissect them in ways which creates division – like consternation and conflict – beginning in our own heads.
Art (including the best of language arts, BTW) allows us to be who we are… and brings out the best aspects of who… and what we are… to become.
Only you’ve said it better!
Jason, I completely appreciate not only your ideas about art and symbol as an organic language, a direct expression of soul, but also I have enjoyed very much your presentation – bringing out the archtypes of the art movement itself.
What has struck me here, is that within each of the art forms, with their widely differing eras and styles, it is a language of nature that speaks through our human experience and expression.
Carl Jung writes in “Man and His Symbols” “What we call a symbol is a term, a name, or even a picture that may be familiar in daily life, yet that possesses specific connotations in addition to its conventional and obvious meaning. It implies something vague, unknown, or hidden from us…. As the mind explores the symbol, it is led to ideas that lie beyond the grasp of reason”
I think your artwork resonates as an intuitive language, but I also love its playfullness, and ancient yet future suggested symbolism.
In my tradition (I am Welsh) it is Celtic Art that provides a mythic language of nature and psyche. It is intriguing to see contemporary art connected with the ancient – even if we live in cities rather than the heart of the forests – artists continue to yearn to touch and express the rhythms of the mystical element of life, even through our unconscious. From nature’s intrinsic patterning from DNA to star systems, through grafitti art or the handprints of the cave painters, all is connected. Its very cool.
Thanks for giving this art history summation through this perspective. Jen
Hey Jason,
This is inspiring stuff. I’m intrigued how you wrote that your mind concentrate on the physical”busy work” of controlling the pen and line and allows the heart creative spirit to take over and express itself. I’ve so often see this demonstrated in psychic arts — giving the physical body, I.E. conscious mind a menial task (for example controlled remote viewing), freeing the subconscious to achieve or create marvels.
So often, art is a conscious mind representation of nature or the environment, where allowing the spirit to just speak with an image has the raw communicative power that appeals to something deep within us, perhaps it is indeed your subconscious communicating to our subconscious in a way that transcends other forms of langauge….
Dear Jason Tucker — A mutual friend alerted me to this website, and I’m astonished at the beauty of your ideas and the illustrations you’ve chosen. I’m so glad you’ve used one of Clyfford Still’s paintings; one of my best memories is going to a museum under the influence of a compound called 2C-B, and coming across Clyfford Still’s paintings, which I had never seen before. I sat down cross-legged on the floor and just stared at one immense painting, trying to absorb it, my whole being resonating. I remember a lightning strike of red, splitting an ocean of black. I’ve been in love with Mr. Still’s work ever since.
Your own work seems familiar, as if I’ve seen these shapes interacting — somewhere — maybe in dreams. And I, too, hope you can find a way to make them move. What an incredible experience that would be!
Now to Google, to find out who and what Lee Bontecou is (or was).
Blessings
Finally.
In order to comment coherently on this, I’ll hafta quote you, and the people you quote. You first brought me up short with this one:
“Impressionism is a word which describes a momentous mutation in Western art history…”
The word “mutation” here made clear to me what you were going for, and somehow lifted the cloud that sort of made the advent of Impressionism a mystery to me. “Mutation” suggests an organic and natural event, rather than one dictated by socio-political reactions to historically “acceptable” images. It made me re-look at the images referenced in your piece for what they communicate ahistorically, more personally and transcendentally interpersonal. I don’t know – maybe “allpersonal” is the term I’m trying to coin? Which leads me to that beautiful bit about
“Aboriginal forms of artistic expression remain as they had always been: sacred acts upholding the social network of the tribe” and also the “one Shipibo woman who told me their designs were not “officially taught.” She described it as being part of their collective, shared experience…” If this is so, and if your project is to express our shared experience as a tribe on a larger, global community level (and maybe off the globe? Henrrrrrrrrry?) then it really is a success. Everyone who I’ve seen have an experience with “Actual Contact” reacts to the images as something they’ve already known, or almost as something they feel they’ve seen before. Even Dave, our resident image-snob. This attitude toward art not as just self-expression but as whole expression is very freeing. I’ve been thinking about this a lot in regards to writing lately.
I was also struck by the paradox of anonymity/fame that grafitti artists…what’s the word? “Enjoy”, maybe? Which makes the “Actual Contact” project sort of like grafitti without the destruction of property.
Finally, I was drawn to the quote from Marie Louise von Franz. In regards to Anthropos, I tend to jump straight to Janus, since I always think the “clean-shaven” face was meant to be female. But I think that’s too limiting – with an archetype like Janus, you’re still stuck in binary. I’m going to hafta chew on this Anthropos thing for a while – probably something good to talk about w/you over sushi.
So glad I finally read this!
J,
You are one of my heroes! Keep making art.
K
jason,
have been now through the links you sent me on one of my blogs, xenolinguistics. would love to have more communication on these languages, their origins, uses, possibilities. the drawings with their dynamism, inside-outside forms and reversals, and their interactions–”nouns” and “verbs” being reunited in action and interaction. see also the merging of separate entities, a kind of fluid beingness, the dance of melding and separating.
thanks so much.
diana
Jason,
Stumbling across this a year plus later…. My thoughts may be disconnected… but you have to realize you are carrying a huge torch. You are justifying your art and you are justifying your connections to those who may or may not be relevant to the historical foundation. I thoroughly believe you are transcribing something much deeper than you are currently understanding. Instead, you are latching onto outside renditions to express yourself. Try confiding in yourself. Try reaching within yourself (and trusting yourself) a bit further. I bet society would benefit.
{ 1 trackback }